TRAVEL SUPPORT FOR SCHOLARSHIPS:

Undergraduate and Graduate Students & Postdocs are eligible to apply for scholarships. Please see the Scholarship tab to apply.

If selected, you will receive three (3) nights double-occupancy lodging (for the nights of October 8-October 10), and up to $500 for travel. You are required to pay the $150 registration fee. You will need to submit all travel receipts for reimbursement, excluding the hotel which will be booked for you. If you apply for the scholarship, please wait until decisions are made, as IRIS will then book your hotel room.

AIRPORT:

The SAGE/GAGE Workshop will be held in Portland, Oregon. The nearest airport is Portland International Airport (PDX). The airport is located 13 miles (25 minutes) from the hotel.

FLIGHT DISCOUNT:

Workshop attendees can access a flight discount through Alaska Airlines. To use this discount (which may not be applicable to all flight classes):

• Go to: www.alaskaair.com
• Enter in the discount code: ECMC494 when searching for flights
• The discount will be applied to any flights meeting contract parameters

Workshop attendees may also use the discount code by calling Alaska Airlines Group Desk (800-445-4435), however, a $15.00/per person ticketing fee will apply. The Group Desk hours of operation are Monday-Friday 6am-6pm PST, Saturday 7:30am-6pm PST, closed Sunday.

HOTEL:

Note: If you are a student scholarship recipient please do not book your hotel room. A double occupancy hotel room will be booked on your behalf by IRIS.

Hilton Portland Downtown
921 SW Sixth Avenue
Portland, Oregon 97204
(503) 226-1611

Reservation Website

The reduced group room rate is $229/night USD.  In addition, a 13.3% hotel occupancy tax and a 2% Tourism Improvement District (TID) will be billed to each room night charge; there is a State of Oregon sales tax rate of 0%. The cut-off date to make room reservations is Monday, September 9, 2019. Please visit this website to make your reservations. If you prefer to call-in and make your reservation, you can call 800-HILTONS (1-800-445-8667) and mention the Group Code: IRI. Reservations made after the cut-off date will not be offered the group rate. Additionally, the group rate is first come first serve; reservations made after the block is filled may need to pay the regular hotel rate.

GROUND TRANSPORTATION:

Portland offers a MAX Red Line Rail Service between the Portland International Airport (PDX) and Portland City Center. The rail service runs every 15 minutes or better and the station closest to the hotel is the Pioneer Square South Station. The trip to/from downtown Portland takes about 38 minutes and costs $2.50 for Adults, $1.25 for Seniors 65+, and $1.25 for Youth ages 7-17. The MAX Station and ticket machines are located near baggage claim on the lower level of PDX.

• Reservations for SuperShuttle service can be made online. They charge $14/one way.
• Uber ranges between $26-$30/one way.
• Taxis are also readily available at the airport to the Hilton for around $35/one way (not including gratuity).

If you're driving to the hotel from PDX: Airport Way: Right on HWY 205 South; Right on I-84 West; Approximately 4 miles, Follow signs to City Center/Morrison Street. Go over Morrison Bridge; Go straight 5 blocks; Left on SW Broadway; Left on Salmon; Left on SW 6th Avenue. Front doors will be on the left.

PARKING:

Overnight Hotel Guests: The hotel does not offer Self Parking. Secured and covered Valet Parking is at a rate of $52/night, with in/out privileges. The hotel is unable to accept oversized vehicles.

THINGS TO DO IN PORTLAND, OR:

• Museum of Science (OMSI)
• Lan Su Chinese Garden

Bridging the Observational Gap in Time: Processes Today and their Relationship to the Past

1. Modeling of co- and early postseismic deformation due to the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence
   Kang Wang, Berkeley Seismological Laboratory, University of California Berkeley; Roland Bürgmann, Berkeley Seismological Laboratory, University of California Berkeley
2. Earthquake Magnitudes from Dynamic Strain: the 2019 Ridgecrest Sequence
   Andrew Barbour, United States Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA
3. Postseismic deformation as recorded by PBO borehole strainmeters following principal events of the 2019 Ridgecrest, California earthquake sequence
   Evelyn Roeloffs, United States Geological Survey
4. Meers Fault; Inactive, Creeping, or Sleeping Monster Fault
   Mortaza Pirouz, University of Texas at Dallas; Robert J. Stern, University of Texas at Dallas
5. GPS Imaging of Crustal Uplift in the High Plains Aquifer, Central United States
   Justine Overacker, University of Nevada, Reno; William C. Hammond, University of Nevada, Reno; Geoffrey Blewitt, University of Nevada, Reno; Corné Kreemer, University of Nevada, Reno
6. Drought Induced Groundwater Loss in and Around Great Salt Lake, Utah, Inferred from 3D GPS Displacements
   Zachary Young, University of Nevada, Reno; Corné Kreemer, University of Nevada, Reno; Geoffrey Blewitt, University of Nevada, Reno
7. Unravelling the strain rate field of Arizona using a regional densification of the Plate Boundary Observatory
   Rick Bennett, University of Arizona; James Broermann, University of Arizona; Corné Kreemer, University of Nevada, Reno; Geoffrey Blewitt, University of Nevada, Reno; Phil Pearthree, Arizona Geological Survey
8. Large and fragmented lithospheric velocity variations in the Northern Canadian Cordillera imaged by ambient noise tomography.
   Derek Schutt, Colorado State University; Robert W., Porritt, University of Texas Institute for Geophysics; Richard C., Aster, Colorado State University; Jeffrey T., Freymuller, Michigan State University; Joel F., Cubley, Yukon College
9. GPS Imaging of Mantle Flow and Flexural Uplift of the Apennines, Italy
   William Hammond, University of Nevada, Reno; Nicola D'Agostino, Instituto Nazionale di Geofisica é Vulcanologia
10. Raton Basin induced seismicity from 2016-2019 reveals short length-scale faults
    Margaret Glasgow, University of New Mexico; Brandon Schmandt, University of New Mexico; Ruijia Wang, University of New Mexico; Sarah Rysanek, University of New Mexico; Ryan Stairs, University of New Mexico

Advances in Geophysics in Extreme Environments

11. Shallow 2-D Active-Source Seismic Imaging of Old Faithful Geyser in the Upper Geyser Basin of Yellowstone National Park
    Jordan Caylor, University of Texas at El Paso; Marianne Karplus, University of Texas at El Paso; Juan Pablo Exparza, Tarrant County College; Jamie Farrell, University of Utah; Julien Chaput, University of Texas at El Paso; Stephen Veitch, University of Texas at El Paso; Galen Kaip, University of Texas at El Paso; Fan-Chi Lin, University of Utah; Aaron Velasco, University of Texas at El Paso; Robert Smith, University of Utah
12. Tidally induced icequake swarms at the grounded margins of the Ross Ice Shelf, Antarctica
    Hank Cole, Colorado State University; Richard C. Aster, Colorado State University; Michael Baker, Colorado State University; Julien Chaput, University of Texas El Paso; Peter D. Bromirski, Scripps Institution of Oceanography; Peter Gerstoft, Scripps Institution of Oceanography; Ralph A. Stephen, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution; Andrew Nyblade, Pennsylvania State University; Douglas A. Wiens, Washington University in St. Louis
13. Constraining the thickness of Europa's ice shell with observations of Rayleigh and flexural wave dispersion: Insights from synthetic waveform modeling
    Ross Maguire, University of New Mexico and University of Maryland; Nicholas Schmerr, University of Maryland; Vedran Lekic, University of Maryland; Terry Hurford, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

Subduction Zones through the Lens of Seismology, Geodesy, and other Geophysical Methods

14. Multi-parameter Volcano Monitoring from Space: Recommendations from the USGS Powell Center Volcano Remote Sensing Working Group and Beyond
    Michael Poland, United States Geological Survey; Matt Pritchard, Cornell University; Kevin Reath, Cornell University; Ben Andrews, Smithsonian Institution; Marco Bagnardi, NASA; Juliet Biggs, University of Bristol; Simon Carn, Michigan Tech; Diego Coppola, University of Turin; Susana Ebmeier, University of Leeds; Maria Furtney, Washington Geologic Survey; Tarsilo Girona, JPL; Julie Griswold, USGS; Taryn Lopez, University of Alaska Fairbanks; Paul Lundgren, JPL; Sarah Ogburn, USGS; Michael Pavolonis, NOAA; Elise Rumpf, USGS; Greg Vaughn, USGS; Christelle Wauthier, Penn State; Rick Wessels, USGS; Rob Wright, University of Hawaii; Kyle Anderson, USGS; Grace Bato, JPL; Alberto Roman, JPL
15. Path-averaged seismic attenuation in southeast Alaska from USArray Transportable Array
    Jenny Nakai, University of New Mexico; Lindsay Lowe-Worthington, University of New Mexico
16. Joint Inversion of Body-wave Arrival Times and Surface-wave Dispersion in Alaska
    Avinash Nayak , University of Wisconsin Madison; Clifford Thurber, University of Wisconsin Madison
17. The 30 November 2018 Mw7.1 Anchorage Earthquake
    Michael West, University of Alaska Fairbanks; Adrian Bender, U.S. Geological Survey; Matthew Gardine, University of Alaska Fairbanks; Lea Gardine, University of Alaska Fairbanks; Kara Gately, NOAA; Peter Haeussler, U.S. Geological Survey; Wael Hassan, University of Alaska Anchorage; Franz Meyer, University of Alaska Fairbanks; Cole Richards, University of Alaska Fairbanks; Natalia Ruppert, University of Alaska Fairbanks; Carl Tape, University of Alaska Fairbanks; John Thornley, Golder Associates Inc.; Rob Witter, U.S. Geological Survey
18. Along-strike segmentation of intermediate-depth seismicity along the Alaska Peninsula
    S. Shawn Wei, Michigan State University; Sydney Gable, Michigan State University; Natalia Ruppert, University of Alaska Fairbanks; Haijiang Zhang, University of Science and Technology of China
19. Slow slip and tectonic tremor episodes on south-central Alaska megathrust
    Baptiste Rousset, University of California Berkeley; Yuning Fu, Bowling Green State University; Noel Bartlow, University of California Berkeley; Roland Bürgmann, University of California Berkeley
20. Completion of AACSE: The Alaska Amphibious Community Seismic Experiment
    Geoffrey Abers, Cornell University; Aubreya Adams, Colgate College; Anne Bécel, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University; Peter Haeussler, U.S. Geological Survey – Anchorage; Emily Roland, University of Washington; Patrick Shore, Washington University of St. Louis; Doug Wiens, Washington University of St. Louis; Susan Schwartz, U.C. Santa Cruz; Anne Sheehan, University of Colorado Boulder; Donna Shillington, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University; Spahr Webb, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University; Lindsay Lowe Worthington, University of New Mexico
21. Seismic evidence for geologic influence on seismicity during the April 1, 2014 Pisagua, Chile Earthquake
    Kathy Davenport, Oregon State University; Anne Tréhu, Oregon State University
22. Local Earthquake Tomography of the Central Oregon Forearc using a large-N, short duration, nodal seismic dataset
    Audrey Dunham, University of Arizona; Eric Kiser, University of Arizona
23. Does Subslab Buoyancy Govern Segmentation of Cascadia's Forearc Topography?
    Miles Bodmer, University of Oregon; Douglas Toomey, University of Oregon; Josh Roering, University of Oregon; Leif Karlstrom, University of Oregon
24. Characterize the Propagation of Seismic Waves along the Cascadia Subduction Zone through Seismic Interferometry
    Xiaotao Yang, Harvard University; Zhitu Ma, Tongji University - China; Marine Denolle, Harvard University
25. A long-term view of Episodic Tremor and Slip in Cascadia
    Noel Bartlow, University of California Berkeley
26. Structural constraints on non-volcanic tremor along the Cascadia margin
    Jonathan Delph, University of Oregon; Amanda Thomas, University of Oregon; Alan Levander, Rice University
27. 10-minute slow slip subevents and atmospheric modulation: Assessing fault zone processes
    Jessica Hawthorne, University of Oxford; Baptiste Gombert, University of Oxford
28. Crustal deformation on quaternary fault zones near the Mendocino Triple Junction inferred from GPS-derived strain rate maps
    Carolyn Nuyen, University of Washington; David Schmidt, University of Washington
29. Three-Dimensional Magnetotelluric Imaging of the Cascadia Subduction Zone with an Amphibious Array
    Gary Egbert, Oregon State University; Bo Yang, Zhezhang University; Dean Livelybrooks, University of Oregon; Paul Bedrosian, USGS, Denver; Kerry Key, Columbia University; Adam Schultz, Oregon State University; Blake Parris, University of Oregon; Anna Kelbert, USGS, Golden
30. Seismic evidence for subduction-induced mantle flows underneath Middle America
    Hejun Zhu, University of Texas at Dallas; Robert Stern, University of Texas at Dallas; Jidong Yang, University of Texas at Dallas
31. Ground Motion Prediction Derived from Interseismic Locking Models for the Subduction Zone in Nicoya, Costa Rica
    Suli Yao, The Chinese University of Hong Kong; Hongfeng Yang, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
32. Transitions in the Banda Arc-Australian Continental Collision Revealed by Surface Wave Tomography
    Ping Zhang, Australian National University; Meghan S. Miller, Australian National University
33. Slip transient pattern changes: external perturbation or intrinsic interaction with earthquakes
    Yingdi Luo, California Institute of Technology; Zhen Liu, JPL, Caltech
34. Seismic signatures of trench rupturing megathrust earthquakes: effects of accretionary-wedge structures
    Jiuxun Yin, Harvard University; Marine Denolle, Harvard University
35. A New Map of Crustal Velocities in Myanmar from GPS: Understanding Strain Partitioning
    Eric Lindsey, Earth Observatory of Singapore; Rishav Mallick, Earth Observatory of Singapore; Lujia Feng, Earth Observatory of Singapore; Wang Yu, National Taiwan University; Lin Thu Aung, Earth Observatory of Singapore; Saw Myat Min, Yangon University; Win Pyae Htet, Myanmar Earthquake Committee; Aung Moe, Myanmar Survey Department; Than Khaing, Myanmar Survey Department; Oo Than, Myanmar Department of Meteorology and Hydrology; Myo Thant, Yangon University; Kyle Bradley, Earth Observatory of Singapore; Roland Burgmann, University of California Berkeley; Emma Hill, Earth Observatory of Singapore
36. Detect slow slip events in ocean bottom pressure data using machine learning
    Bing He, University of Rhode Island; Meng Wei, University of Rhode Island; D. Randolph Watts, University of Rhode Island; Kathleen A. Donohue, University of Rhode Island; Karen L. Tracey, University of Rhode Island; Yang Shen, University of Rhode Island
37. Seismic velocity model of the northern Hikurangi margin, New Zealand from combined active and passive sources: Initial results from the Seismogenesis at Hikurangi Integrated Research Experiment (SHIRE)
    Thomas Luckie , University of Southern California; Andrew Gase, The University of Texas at Austin Institute for Geophysics; Malcolm White, University of Southern California; Katrina Jacobs, GNS Science; Stuart Henrys, GNS Science; David Okaya, University of Southern California; Harm Van Avendonk, The University of Texas at Austin Institute for Geophysics; Nathan Bangs, The University of Texas at Austin Institute for Geophysics; Daniel Barker, GNS Science; Daniel Bassett, GNS Science; Shuichi Kodaira, JAMSTEC; Ryuta Arai, JAMSTEC; Gou Fujie, JAMSTEC; Yojiro Yamamoto, JAMSTEC
38. A time dependent inversion of onshore geodetic data for the 2019 Hikurangi subduction zone slow slip event
    Katherine Woods, Victoria University of Wellington; Laura Wallace, GNS Science, New Zealand and Institute for Geophysics, University of Texas at Austin; Martha Savage, Victoria University of Wellington; Spahr Webb, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University; David Chadwell, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego; Yoshihiro Ito, Kyoto University; Kimihiro Mochizuki, University of Tokyo; Charles Williams, GNS Science; Ian Hamling, GNS Science

Earth Rheology and Structure: New Approaches, Applications, and Implications for Dynamics

39. Trans-dimensional Bayesian inversion of subsurface density structure and its geometry using gravity data
    Surya Pachhai, University of Utah; Michael Thorne, University of Utah; Christian Hardwick, Utah Geological Survey
40. Mineral Exploration Applications for EON-ROSE and other large geophysical programs
    Katherine Boggs, Mount Royal University; Martyn Unsworth, University of Alberta; David Eaton, University of Calgary; Fiona Darbyshire, Université du Québec à Montréal; Keith Benn, Terracognita Geological Consulting Inc.
41. Hydration State of the Upper Mantle in Subduction Arc-Backarc Regions from Magnetotellurics Using the Western U.S. as an Example
    Philip Wannamaker, University of Utah; Virginie Maris, University of Utah; Kevin Mendoza, University of Utah; John Booker, University of Washington
42. A mid-crustal channel of radial anisotropy beneath the northeastern Basin and Range and its metamorphic core complexes
    Justin Wilgus, University of New Mexico; Chengxin Jiang, Harvard University; Brandon Schmandt, University of New Mexico
43. Surface-wave Radial Anisotropy Illuminates Magma Storage and Migration at Okmok caldera, Alaska
    Ninfa Bennington, University of Wisconsin-Madison; David Miller, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Matthew Haney, USGS Alaska Volcano Observatory; Paul Bedrosian, USGS; Kerry Key, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory; Clifford Thurber, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Laney Hart, University of Wisconsin-Madison; Summer Ohlendorf, National Tsunami Warning Center
44. Shear Wave Splitting across the Mackenzie Mountains
    Andrew Bolton, Colorado State University; Derek Witt, SWIIM System Ltd., Derek Schutt, Colorado State University; Rick Aster, Colorado State University; Jeffrey Freymueller, Michigan State University; Joel Cubley, Yukon College
45. Tectonic inheritance via the influence of crustal composition and deformation fabric on deformation response and the geometry of faults and anisotropic shear zones in California
    Vera Schulte-Pelkum, University of Colorado Boulder; Sarah Brownlee, Wayne State University; Kai Wang, University of Toronto; Chengxin Jiang, Harvard University; Zachary Ross, California Institute of Technology; Yehuda Ben- Zion, University of Southern California
46. Crustal deformation in southern California constrained by radial anisotropy from ambient noise adjoint tomography
    Chengxin Jiang, Harvard University; Kai Wang, University of Toronto; Yingjie Yang, Macquarie University; Vera Schulte-Pelkum, University of Colorado Boulder; Qinya Liu, University of Toronto
47. Characterizing lithospheric structure beneath Connecticut using Sp receiver functions
    Gillian Goldhagen, University of California, Riverside; Heather A. Ford, University of California, Riverside; Maureen D. Long, Yale University
48. Complex shear-wave splitting implies simple anisotropy in the lithosphere and asthenosphere beneath the eastern U.S.
    Karen Fischer, Brown University; Julia G. MacDougall, Carnegie Institution for Science; Yichen Geng, Carnegie Institution for Science; Lara S. Wagner, Carnegie Institution for Science; Robert B. Hawman, University of Georgia
49. Imaging and modelling the titled Yellowstone Plume
    Peter Nelson, University of Texas at Austin; Bernhard Steinberger, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences; Stephen P. Grand, University of Texas at Austin
50. An Updated View of the Australian Lithosphere
    Andrew Birkey, University of California Riverside; Heather A Ford, University of California Riverside; Page Dabney, Eckerd College; Gillian Goldhagen, University of California Riverside
51. Seismic-Wave Attenuation and the Grain-Boundary Sliding Rheology: A Test for the MLD and the LAB
    Jeffrey Park, Yale University; Tolulope Olugboji, University of Rochester; Shun-Ichiro Karato, Yale University
52. The Distribution of Mid-Lithospheric Discontinuities on Precambrian Continents
    Hannah Krueger, Brown University; Karen Fischer, Brown University; Isabella Gama, Brown University; Junlin Hua, Brown University; Zachary Eilon, University of California - Santa Barbara
53. Mantle Transition Zone velocity jump and sharpness study using a compilation of temporary seismic arrays
    Brandon Schmandt, University of New Mexico; Margaret Glasgow, University of New Mexico;
54. Prominent thermal anomalies in the Mantle Transition Zone beneath the Transantarctic Mountains, Antarctica
    Erica Emry, New Mexico Tech; Andrew A. Nyblade, Penn State University; Alan Horton, New Mexico Tech; Jordi Julià, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte; Samantha E. Hansen, University of Alabama; Sridhar Anandakrishnan, Penn State University; Richard C. Aster, Colorado State University; Audrey D. Huerta, Central Washington University; Douglas A. Wiens, Washington University in St. Louis; Terry J. Wilson, Ohio State University; J. Paul Winberry, Central Washington University
55. Investigating Ultra-low Velocity Zones in the Southern Hemisphere using an Antarctic Dataset
    Samantha Hansen, University of Alabama; Sarah E. Carson, University of Alabama; Edward J. Garnero, Arizona State University; Shule Yu, Arizona State University; Sebastian Rost, University of Leeds
56. Recent glacial isostasy and new constitutive approaches to the spectrum of low frequency geodynamics
    Erik Ivins, JPL-Caltech; Lambert Caron, JPL-Caltech; Eric Larour, JPL-Caltech; Surendra Adhikari, JPL-Caltech; Helene Seroussi, JPL-Caltech; Mirko Scheinert, Technical University of Dresden; Martin Horwath, Technical University of Dresden; Andrew Lloyd, Washington University of St. Louis; Douglas Wiens, Washington University of St. Louis
57. Composition of deep crust imaged by USArray
    Siyuan Sui, Stony Brook University; Weisen Shen, Stony Brook University
58. Crustal architecture beneath eastern China revealed by receiver function analysis
    Lingli Li, Stony Brook University; Weisen Shen, Stony Brook University; Siyuan Sui, Stony Brook University
59. Array-based earthquake detection with multiple techniques
    Qiushi Zhai, Georgia Institute of Technology; Zhigang Peng, Georgia Institute of Technology; Zefeng Li, California Institute of Technology; Chenyu Li, Georgia Institute of Technology; Liang Zhao, Chinese Academy of Sciences
60. Seasonal seismicity in the Western Branch of the East African Rift System
    Liang Xue, Bowling Green State University; Christopher W. Johnson, University of California San Diego; Yuning Fu, Bowling Green State University; Roland Bürgmann, University of California Berkeley
61. Variation of the mode of slip along the Blanco Transform Fault, NE Pacific
    Vaclav Kuna, Oregon State University; John Nabelek, Oregon State University; Jochen Braunmiller, University of South Florida
62. Surface-wave constraints on upper mantle petrofabric and flow beneath ~40 Ma seafloor in the south Pacific
    Joshua Russell, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia University; James B. Gaherty, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory at Columbia University; Zachary Eilon, University of California, Santa Barbara; Donald W. Forsyth, Brown University; Göran Ekström, Columbia University

New and Exotic Approaches for Acquiring, Analyzing and Modeling in Geophysics

63. Toward Creating a Subsurface Camera
    Sili Wang, University of Georgia; Wenzhan Song, Georgia State University; Fangyu Li, University of Georgia; Maria Valero, University of Georgia
64. IRIS DMC's Latest Data Products
    Manochehr Bahavar, IRIS DMC; Chad Trabant, IRIS DMC; Robert Weekly, IRIS DMC; Mick Van Fossen, IRIS DMC; Jerry Carter, IRIS DMC
65. HPC Workflow Management in Seismology: Global CMT 3D Inversion
    Lucas Sawade, Princeton University; Wenjie Lei, Princeton University; Frederik Simons, Princeton University; Jessica Irving, Princeton University; Jeroen Tromp, Princeton University
66. A deep neural network approach to seismic event discrimination and phase identification
    Nishath Ranasinghe, Prairie View A & M University; Nalinda Kulathunga, Texas Southern University;
67. Overtone Interference in Fundamental-Mode Rayleigh Wave Phase and Amplitude
    Anant Hariharan, Brown University; Colleen Dalton, Brown University; Zhitu Ma, Tongji University; Göran Ekström, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University; Donald Forsyth, Brown University
68. Improved Upper Mantle Seismic Imaging Beneath the Pacific Northwest Interior
    A. Christian Stanciu, University of Oregon; Eugene Humphreys, University of Oregon
69. Exploration of end-member models for inverting 1D InSAR data for 3D displacements: Application to deformation at a groundwater entrainment site in the Coachella Valley
    Kyle Murray, Cornell University; Rowena Lohman, Cornell University; Jeonghyeop Kim, Stony Brook University; William Holt, Stony Brook University
70. Characterizing Time-Dependent Deformation Processes in Imperial Valley, California
    Junle Jiang, Cornell University; Rowena Lohman, Cornell University
71. Leveraging an operational archive of ARIA standard InSAR products for higher level time-series generation
    David Bekaert, Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL); Simran Sangha, JPL and University of California; Emre Havazli, JPL; Brett Buzzanga, Old Dominion University; Mohammed Karim, JPL; Justin Linick, JPL; Hook Hua, JPL; Namrata Malarout, JPL; Marjorie Lucas, JPL; Piyush Agram, JPL; Heresh Fattahi, JPL; Susan Owen, JPL; Judy Lai-Norling, JPL; ARIA Team, JPL
72. Kinematic magma volume accumulation at Westdahl volcano, Alaska, from 1992 to 2019
    Xueming Xue, Michigan State University; Jeff Freymueller, Michigan State University
73. High spatial resolution 2D wetland surface water flow modeling in the Everglades, Florida, constrained by Interferometric SAR observations
    Heming Liao, Florida International University; Reinaldo Garcia, Florida International University and Hydronia, LLC; Shimon Wdowinski, Florida International University
74. Probabilistic Mapping of August 2018 Flood of Kerala, India, Using Space-borne Synthetic Aperture Radar
    Sonam Sherpa, Arizona State University; Manoochehr Shirzaei, Arizona State University; Chandrakanta Ojha, Arizona State University; Susanna Werth, Arizona State University
75. Widespread Subsidence and Carbon Emissions across Southeast Asian Peatlands
    Estelle Chaussard, University of Oregon; Alison M. Hoyt, Massachussetts Institute of Technology and Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry; Sandra S. Seppalainen, University of Oregon; Charles F. Harvey, University of Oregon and Singapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology
76. Comparing InSAR, microwave, and optical measurements of soil moisture in hyper-arid regions
    Paula Burgi, Cornell University; Rowena Lohman, Cornell University
77. Soil moisture impacts on InSAR
    Rowena Lohman, Cornell University; Paula Burgi, Cornell University
78. Detecting microearthquakes with template matching and deep learning around the 2009 Typhoon Morakot in Taiwan
    Zhigang Peng, Georgia Tech; Qiushi Zhai, Georgia Tech; Lindsay Y. Chuang, Georgia Tech; Lijun Zhu, Georgia Tech; James McClellan, Georgia Tech; Shimon Wdowinski, Florida International University
79. Numerical Modeling of Earthquake Triggering Due to Erosion Unloading in Central Taiwan
    Shanshan Li, Florida International University; Shimon Windowinski, Florida International University; Gregory Ruetenik, University of Wisconsin Madison; Ken Ferrier, University of Wisconsin Madison
80. Automating the Detection of Dynamically Triggered Earthquakes via a Deep Metric Learning Algorithm
    Vivian Tang, Northwestern University; Prem Seetharaman, Northwestern University; Kevin Chao, Northwestern University; Bryan A. Pardo, Northwestern University; Suzan van der Lee, Northwestern University
81. Stormquakes
    Wenyuan Fan, Florida State University; Jeffrey McGuire, USGS; Catherine de Groot-Hedlin, SIO; Michael Hedlin, SIO; Sloan Coats, WHOI; Julia Fiedler, SIO
82. 25-Second Determination of 2019 M7.1 Ridgecrest Earthquake Coseismic Deformation from Global GNSS Seismic Monitoring
    Tim Melbourne, Central Washington University; Walter Szeliga, Central Washington University; Marcelo Santillan, Central Washington University; Craig Scrivner, Central Washington University

Facilities, Operations, and Management

83. Rebuilding the Western Canada Deformation Array and Canadian National Seismograph Network
    Lisa Nykolaishen, Natural Resources Canada; Henry Seywerd, Natural Resources Canada; Yuan Lu, Natural Resources Canada; Joseph Henton, Natural Resources Canada
84. Six-degree-of-freedom Seismogeodesy using Android GNSS, accelerometer and gyroscope data for Rapid Earthquake Response
    Jianghui Geng, Wuhan University; Guangcai Li, Wuhan University; Kai Liu, Wuhan University; Qiang Wen, Wuhan University; Enming Jiang, Wuhan University
85. Rapid expansion of a multi-hazard monitoring network: lessons learned, challenges, and opportunities presented by the 2019 ALERT Wildfire camera network buildout.
    Jayne Bormann, University of Nevada, Reno; Graham Kent, University of Nevada, Reno; Neal Driscoll, University of California, San Diego; Ken Smith, University of Nevada, Reno; Mark Williams, University of Nevada, Reno; Gabe Plank, University of Nevada, Reno; David Slater, University of Nevada, Reno; Doug Toomey, University of Oregon; Leland Driscoll, University of Oregon
86. New Instrumentation for Rapidly Responding to Geohazards
    Justin Sweet, IRIS; Kent Anderson, IRIS; Bob Woodward, IRIS
87. Expanding Magnetotellurics at IRIS - Continuing Surveys of North America and Establishing New Portable MT Capabilities
    Andy Frassetto, IRIS; Adam Schultz, Oregon State University; Bruce Beaudoin, IRIS PASSCAL/New Mexico Tech; Justin Sweet, IRIS; Kent Anderson, IRIS; Bob Woodward, IRIS
88. EarthScope Alaska Transportable Array: Transition and Conclusion
    Robert W. Busby, IRIS; Robert L. Woodward, IRIS; Kasey Aderhold, IRIS; Ryan Bierma, IRIS; Doug Bloomquist, IRIS; Jeremy Miner, IRIS; Molly Staats, IRIS; John Soderquist, IRIS; Frank L. Vernon, UCSD
89. The Impact of USArray on Earthquake Monitoring in Alaska
    Natalia Ruppert, University of Alaska Fairbanks; Michael E. West, University of Alaska Fairbanks
90. Ongoing Modernization of Global Seismographic Network (GSN) Stations
    Katrin Hafner, IRIS; Peter Davis, IDA/UCSD; David Wilson, ASL/USGS; Kasey Aderhold, IRIS; Carl Ebeling, IDA/UCSD; Andy Frassetto, IRIS; Adam Ringler ASL/USGS
91. Installation and Performance of a Small Aperture Posthole Array at Albuquerque Seismological Laboratory
    Robert Anthony, United States Geological Survey; Adam Ringler, United States Geological Survey; David Wilson, United States Geological Survey; Rebecca Rodd, KBR Wyle; Joseph Maharrey, KBR Wyle
92. Validating Regional Station Performance Using Teleseismic Event Stacks
    Adam Ringler, United States Geological Survey; Rebecca Rodd, KBR, Albuquerque Seismological Laboratory; Andrew Holcomb, KBR, Albuquerque Seismological Laboratory
93. Geodetic network expansion during the 2018 Kīlauea eruption
    Sarah Conway, USGS-Hawaiian Volcano Observatory; Ingrid Johanson, USGS-Hawaiian Volcano Observatory; Asta Miklius, USGS-Hawaiian Volcano Observatory; Brian Shiro, USGS-Hawaiian Volcano Observatory; Brian Meyers, USGS-Cascades Volcano Observatory; Rebecca Kramer, USGS-Cascades Volcano Observatory
94. Introduction to Anubis software for GNSS quality control in the NSF GAGE facility and NOTA
    Christine Puskas, UNAVCO; Charles M. Meertens, UNAVCO; David A. Phillips, UNAVCO; Frederick Blume, UNAVCO; Mike Rost, UNAVCO
95. NSF NSF GAGE Facility GNSS Data Archives and Products
    Kelly Enloe, UNAVCO; David Phillips, UNAVCO; Charles Meertens, UNAVCO; Dan Reiner, UNAVCO; David Maggert, UNAVCO; Christine Puskas, UNAVCO; Michael Rost, UNAVCO; Michael Marquez, UNAVCO; Susanna Gross, UNAVCO
96. UNAVCO Support to the NASA Global Geodetic Network and Space Geodesy Project
    Sarah Doelger, UNAVCO; Jacob Sklar, UNAVCO; David Stowers, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory; Freddy Blume, UNAVCO; Glen Mattioli, UNAVCO; Chuck Meertens, UNAVCO
97. UNAVCO Network of the Americas Performance During 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence
    Christian Walls, UNAVCO; Doerte Mann, UNAVCO; David Mencin, UNAVCO; Kathleen Hodgkinson, UNAVCO; Christine Puskas, UNAVCO; Shawn Lawrence, UNAVCO; Andre Basset, UNAVCO; Ryan Turner, UNAVCO; Karl Feaux, UNAVCO; Glen Mattioli, UNAVCO

Education, Workforce, and Outreach/Community Engagement

98. Martian InSight Data Access for Researchers and Educators
    Tammy Bravo, IRIS; Rick Benson, IRIS; Mladen Dordevic, IRIS; John Taber, IRIS
99. Assessing and Communicating Risk from Low-Activity Faults in British Columbia, Canada
    Tiegan Hobbs, Natural Resources Canada; Murray Journeay, Natural Resources Canada;
100. Community Science Liaison Program: Transforming scientific outreach by connecting K-12 Citizen Science Groups with EON-ROSE scientists
     Katherine Boggs, Mount Royal University; Kevin O’Connor, Mount Royal University; Robert Sharp, Yukon Education (retired); Marina Clark, Calgary Board of Education; Hersh Gilbert, University of Calgary; Jason Droboth, EON-ROSE Executive; David Eaton, University of Calgary
101. Engaging undergraduates using animations to demystify science concepts
     Jenda Johnson, IRIS; Robert Butler, University of Portland; Wendy Bohon, IRIS; Michael Hubenthal, IRIS; John Taber, IRIS
102. From Data Visualization to Geoscience Visual Storytelling
     Ning Wang, University of Texas at Dallas; Robert J Stern, University of Texas at Dallas
103. Geodesy Data-rich Undergraduate Teaching Materials and Instructor Professional Development
     Beth Pratt-Sitaula, UNAVCO; Bruce Douglas, Indiana University; Becca Walker, Mt San Antonio College; Benjamin Crosby, Idaho State University; Kristin O'Connell, SERC; Donna Charlevoix, UNAVCO
104. Investigating career pathways of undergraduates interested in seismology/geophysics: Longitudinal tracking of IRIS undergraduate internship alumni (1998 - 2018)
     Michael Hubenthal, IRIS; John Taber, IRIS